Comparing Electoral Systems

Ranked Choice Voting (RCV)

Rank Up to All · One (1) Winner

Voters rank the candidates — 1 for their first choice, 2 for their second, and so on. If a preferred candidate is eliminated, that vote transfers to the next choice still standing.

VERSION 1This lesson video is a first draft — we’ll keep improving it. If you can script, narrate, animate, or edit, help us produce the next version.Help Make Our Videos →

Test Your Knowledge

This page and its video include a quiz you can take to test your understanding of the content. This lesson is part of a larger education series.

The Setup

How Ranked Choice Voting Works

Walk through a single race. Voters rank the field, and the count runs in rounds — then watch what that produces.

Rank Your Choices

Instead of picking just one, rank the candidates in order of preference. If your top choice is eliminated, your vote moves to your next choice still in the running.

Rank Candidate Selection
1st Choice
2nd Choice
3rd Choice
4th Choice
5th Choice
6th Choice

The Candidates & Their Votes

First-choice tallies rarely settle it outright. The count runs in rounds, transferring votes from eliminated candidates until someone reaches a majority — here D (Yellow).

Candidate Faction Votes Share
D 🟨 Yellow 200,000 (50%)
- F - 🟩 Green 110,000 11%
- J - 🟪 Purple 10,000 1%
- B - 🟧 Orange 160,000 16%
- A - 🟥 Red 20,000 2%
G 🟦 Blue 300,000 (39%)
- J - 🟪 Purple 30,000 3%
- B - 🟧 Orange 50,000 5%
- A - 🟥 Red 10,000 1%
- Dropped 110,000 11%

What the Vote Produces

Follow one race from the ranked ballots to who ends up ruling. Each step uses the real numbers from the ballot above.

Vote Share

Once ballots are ranked, the lowest-placed candidate is eliminated first and their second-choice votes are redistributed.

Outcome

RCV gives voters real alternatives — yet, as shown, large shares of the electorate can still be locked out of government at any one time.

Seat Control

Here D (Yellow) wins only thanks to transferred support from F (Green), J (Purple), B (Orange) and A (Red).

Committee Control

Even with a broad coalition behind the winner, one faction still takes the single seat — and with it, the committee.

The Count

How the Rounds Are Counted

No majority on the first count? Eliminate the lowest, transfer their ballots to the next choice, and repeat — round by round until someone crosses 50%.

After voters rank their candidates, the candidate with the least votes is eliminated first and their voters 2nd choice votes are redistributed. This process repeats until One (1) Candidate reaches a majority or there is only one candidate standing. Unlike two-round voting (not depicted), voters are able to rank their choices in a single ballot rather than having to return to the polls to vote in a second ballot. In this example, voters from other factions coalesced around D🟨(Yellow) to achieve victory of major rivals G🟦(Blue) and B🟧(Orange).

Follow the Votes — Round by Round

Step through each round and watch the ballots flow. Each band is colored by the party the votes came from; when a candidate is eliminated (greyed out) their ballots transfer to the next choice, until someone crosses the 50% majority and wins the single seat — marked with a gold medal.

Round 1 · First Choices
1 / 5
R1R2R3R4R5first choicesresultJGFBADJGFBDGFBDGBDGD1
Seats wonDSeat 1
CandidatesJGFBAD
1won a seat   eliminated   exhausted ballots

The Catch

RCV Still Tends Toward Two Parties

Ranked choice removes the spoiler effect — but strategic voting and district-drawing still push toward two dominant camps.

Two Party Deadlock

Like in FPTP, under RCV Factions are forced to strategically vote to gain a competitive edge. However, unlike FPTP, the Spoiler Effect is not present.

Faction Count Vote Share
🟧 Orange 510,000 49%
🟦 Blue 490,000 51%

Strategic District Drawing

Because RCV also tends toward two parties, Power structures under RCV can draw electoral maps so that future election results are likely to favor the status quo.

Faction Count Vote Share
🟧 Orange 600,000 60%
🟦 Blue 400,000 40%
🟧 Orange 🟦 Blue
2 3

A More Representative Way

Proportional Ranked Choice Voting

RCV fixes the spoiler effect, but one seat still means one winner — and RCV still drifts toward two parties. PR-RCV keeps the ranked ballot and elects several winners, so seats match how people actually voted.

Head to Head

The Four Systems, Compared

The same electorate, four systems. Step through each — its real ballot, its real charts, and the share of voters it actually represents.

12% of voters represented

Autocratic Voting

The prevailing power structure controls who may run and who may vote. Every candidate who threatens the incumbent is disqualified before the vote.

Vote Share

Outcome

Seat Control

Your Ballot

Leader Appointment

The Result

12%

Voters Represented

The verdict: the vote is a formality — after disqualification, one faction controls every seat and the governed have no real say.

Plurality Voting (FPTP)

One vote each, one winner per race — whoever finishes first, even without a majority.

Vote Share

Outcome

Seat Control

Your Ballot

Candidate Selection

The Result

30%

Voters Represented

The verdict: the largest faction takes the seat outright. Everyone who backed anyone else — most voters — wins nothing.

Ranked Choice Voting (RCV)

Voters rank the candidates; the lowest is eliminated and ballots transfer to the next choice until someone holds a majority.

Vote Share

Outcome

Seat Control

Your Ballot

Rank Candidate Selection
1st Choice
2nd Choice
3rd Choice
4th Choice
5th Choice
6th Choice

The Result

50%

Voters Represented

The verdict: the winner now has majority support and the spoiler effect is gone — but one seat still means one faction controls it.

Proportional Ranked Choice Voting (PR-RCV)

Voters rank candidates for a multi-seat race. A candidate needs only a proportional quota — here 20%, for five seats.

Vote Share

Outcome

Seat Control

Your Ballot

Rank Candidate Selection
1st Choice
2nd Choice
3rd Choice
4th Choice
5th Choice
6th Choice
7th Choice
8th Choice
9th Choice
10th Choice

The Result

95%

Voters Represented

The verdict: several factions win seats from the same race, so control is shared in proportion to the vote — almost everyone is represented.

Want the full mechanics behind every system?

The Better Model

Proportional RCV in Action

Keep the ranked ballot, but elect several winners from one race. Here is that same electorate under proportional ranked choice voting.

PR-RCV keeps the ranked ballot you just used, but each race fills several seats at once — more winners per district, or several districts combined into one. Here five seats are filled at a 20% quota.

The Multi-Winner Ballot

Candidate Faction Count Share
B 🟧 Orange 170,000 (20%)
A - 🟥 Red 30,000 3%
D 🟨 Yellow 110,000 (20%)
E - 🟨 Yellow 90,000 9%
F 🟩 Green 120,000 (20%)
C - 🟧 Orange 70,000 7%
A - 🟥 Red 10,000 1%
G 🟦 Blue 200,000 (20%)
J 🟪 Purple 80,000 (15%)
I - 🟦 Blue 20,000 2%
G - 🟦 Blue 40,000 4%
H - 🟦 Blue 10,000 1%
· Dropped 50,000 5%

How to Read It

Underlined — reached the quota and won a seat.
Indented italic — eliminated or over-quota, with votes transferred to the next choice.
Dropped — exhausted ballots with no ranking left to count.

The result: five different factions each clear the quota — a spread of parties in proportion to the vote, instead of one winner-take-all seat.

PR-RCV Outcome

PR-RCV Seat Control

Why It Wins

Why Proportional RCV Wins

Only proportional ranked choice keeps the final outcome matching the voters' interests. Here is what that unlocks.

Protects Diversity

Because seats are awarded in proportion to the vote, every political group holds a share of power at all times — not just whoever narrowly won the last election. Minority voices stay represented instead of being erased between cycles.

Breaks Deadlocks

Two-party systems built on First Past the Post tend to lock into gridlock, each side able to block the other. Proportional representation opens the floor to more parties, so shifting coalitions can form and actually move legislation forward.

Enhances Efficiency

In one-party and no-party states, autocratic incentives reward loyalty over results and let problems fester. PR-RCV replaces those incentives with genuine competition, pushing officials to govern effectively to keep their support.

Empowers Party Members

Members no longer have to fall in line behind a single leader to matter. Because several candidates from one party can win, individual members carry real weight and can champion the issues their own communities care about.

Increases Leverage for Legislators

Individual legislators gain the leverage to represent their own jurisdictions rather than simply voting as faction leadership dictates. That independence gives local communities a far stronger voice in national negotiations.

Ensures Neutrality

When no single faction can dominate, the pressure on speakers, chairs, civil officers, and other appointees to take sides falls away. Balanced power lets them stay genuinely neutral and carry out their duties impartially.

Promotes Cooperation

Because a single faction rarely wins an outright majority, governing requires building coalitions and finding common ground. That structural nudge rewards cooperation and negotiation over the winner-take-all combativeness of other systems.

Get Involved

Help Us Complete This Vision!

Ranked choice is a real step up — but one seat still means one winner. Bring your creativity, skills, or resources to the Cosmopolitan Coalition and help build a system where seats match the voters.